Why Some Teams Are Disallowed

NASA has encountered serious failures over time due to a failure to standardize on metric measurements only (is this due to being a government controlled corporation?) NASA has suffered catastrophic failures, costing lives and many millions of dollars. Dual scales of measurement and calculation caused some failures. NASA is funded and run as an unprofitable business of the American government, which in their capitalist society amounts to a socialist corporation. If you probe objectively why it exists, you’ll see NASA justifies its existence by stimulating developments in related industries and provides a stage for nationalistic hype. People enjoy their ‘shows’. No doubt many enjoyed seeing the flight for the X-Prize too. It wasn’t government funded and cost far less to produce. This hype or propaganda is window dressing (read: no immediate economic value in the space discoveries.) So a less obvious agenda exists.

Due to what we found we will deny teams from NASA or other space agencies from entering this challenge. If employees or contractors of a government, have contracts or agreements, or are directly funded by government or government run space agencies or corporations they cannot compete.  Read contract agreements NASA subjects employees and contactors to http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/other/nasa/1827.htm NASA (US government) controls all inventions related to work done in association with them.

As many rumors exist about Area 51, and about reports and evidence of vehicles using the technology (we are about to create) being hidden within various governments’ departments and ‘off-limits’ warehouses, more questions arise. If it is so then are they self-serving servants to keep it from their masters, the electors, the people who, through taxes, pay the bills and their wages? Do the servants plan to go into business against their masters or do they have more sinister intentions? Are they looking for ways to assert control over them in ways their masters have not expressly agreed to? Do civil servants, through quasi separate entities, intend on controlling inventions they can use for their advantage, like for making war? It appears that way, and our perception is shared by many. (We know war is rarely started by people or businesses. It usually takes governments to start one, or to hire spies and ‘informants’ to justify their high-handed actions.)

The existence of hidden evidence has little to do with national security and a lot to do with power and control the servants gradually accorded themselves. Wasn’t there a similar scenario a few centuries ago when the grip of religion over knowledge, politics and business had to be broken? (And numerous nations in which similar events occurred, relating to rulers.) Or is it the foreseen, insidiously invasive government of Orwell’s prophetic book, 1984? Isn’t this like the problem we’ve seen with dictators where the power to rule was taken by force, quickly rather than slowly? It appears the necessary transparency of intent and cooperation for the benefit of “the householders” in more than one democracy is being hidden by some servants, ones who are covert enemies of peace for a variety of reasons. Not all of the servants would be aware of the dubious intentions of the highest bureaucrats, but some must be. It's certain some of them were hired, not elected.

All sorts of scenarios come to mind. People who love conspiracies would suggest it’s a long term pact with a secret or not-so-secret organization. Do only a few people know what the objectives are? Does the idea of nuclear warheads in orbit sound like a choice peaceful people would make, or something power-hungry servants want, or what a lobbyist wants? (The military, CIA and FBI are all servants, or servants of the servants; servants who keep growing in power over the people who are their masters and are not sufficiently answerable for their misdoings.)

It is not our intent to open the discussion about related failings or perceived conspiracies, just to state our reasons for denying certain teams. Fortunately Americans treasure freedom of speech as much as they love the spectacle of 'crowning' their top servants. They will appreciate having the points of concern brought to their attention, even if the points raise issues they might prefer to ignore or deny.